Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lancet ; 394(10194): 249-260, 2019 Jul 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31327369

RESUMEN

Oral diseases are among the most prevalent diseases globally and have serious health and economic burdens, greatly reducing quality of life for those affected. The most prevalent and consequential oral diseases globally are dental caries (tooth decay), periodontal disease, tooth loss, and cancers of the lips and oral cavity. In this first of two papers in a Series on oral health, we describe the scope of the global oral disease epidemic, its origins in terms of social and commercial determinants, and its costs in terms of population wellbeing and societal impact. Although oral diseases are largely preventable, they persist with high prevalence, reflecting widespread social and economic inequalities and inadequate funding for prevention and treatment, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). As with most non-communicable diseases (NCDs), oral conditions are chronic and strongly socially patterned. Children living in poverty, socially marginalised groups, and older people are the most affected by oral diseases, and have poor access to dental care. In many LMICs, oral diseases remain largely untreated because the treatment costs exceed available resources. The personal consequences of chronic untreated oral diseases are often severe and can include unremitting pain, sepsis, reduced quality of life, lost school days, disruption to family life, and decreased work productivity. The costs of treating oral diseases impose large economic burdens to families and health-care systems. Oral diseases are undoubtedly a global public health problem, with particular concern over their rising prevalence in many LMICs linked to wider social, economic, and commercial changes. By describing the extent and consequences of oral diseases, their social and commercial determinants, and their ongoing neglect in global health policy, we aim to highlight the urgent need to address oral diseases among other NCDs as a global health priority.


Asunto(s)
Salud Global , Enfermedades de la Boca/epidemiología , Salud Pública , Costo de Enfermedad , Caries Dental/epidemiología , Personas con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos , Enfermedades de la Boca/complicaciones , Enfermedades de la Boca/economía , Enfermedades de la Boca/terapia , Neoplasias de la Boca/epidemiología , Enfermedades Periodontales/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores Socioeconómicos
2.
Lancet ; 394(10194): 261-272, 2019 Jul 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31327370

RESUMEN

Oral diseases are a major global public health problem affecting over 3·5 billion people. However, dentistry has so far been unable to tackle this problem. A fundamentally different approach is now needed. In this second of two papers in a Series on oral health, we present a critique of dentistry, highlighting its key limitations and the urgent need for system reform. In high-income countries, the current treatment-dominated, increasingly high-technology, interventionist, and specialised approach is not tackling the underlying causes of disease and is not addressing inequalities in oral health. In low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), the limitations of so-called westernised dentistry are at their most acute; dentistry is often unavailable, unaffordable, and inappropriate for the majority of these populations, but particularly the rural poor. Rather than being isolated and separated from the mainstream health-care system, dentistry needs to be more integrated, in particular with primary care services. The global drive for universal health coverage provides an ideal opportunity for this integration. Dental care systems should focus more on promoting and maintaining oral health and achieving greater oral health equity. Sugar, alcohol, and tobacco consumption, and their underlying social and commercial determinants, are common risk factors shared with a range of other non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Coherent and comprehensive regulation and legislation are needed to tackle these shared risk factors. In this Series paper, we focus on the need to reduce sugar consumption and describe how this can be achieved through the adoption of a range of upstream policies designed to combat the corporate strategies used by the global sugar industry to promote sugar consumption and profits. At present, the sugar industry is influencing dental research, oral health policy, and professional organisations through its well developed corporate strategies. The development of clearer and more transparent conflict of interest policies and procedures to limit and clarify the influence of the sugar industry on research, policy, and practice is needed. Combating the commercial determinants of oral diseases and other NCDs should be a major policy priority.


Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica/organización & administración , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Enfermedades de la Boca/terapia , Salud Bucal , Sacarosa en la Dieta/efectos adversos , Industria de Alimentos , Salud Global , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Enfermedades de la Boca/etiología , Odontología Preventiva/organización & administración , Salud Pública
3.
J Dent ; 87: 49-54, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31075367

RESUMEN

In the new era of global health, a closer integration of oral health with the wider body of medicine and health systems will be essential. This will ensure that oral diseases are addressed alongside the other non-communicable diseases. Mainstreaming patient-centred primary prevention, underpinned by transforming educational and workforce systems to create future leaders in global oral health, is vital if the challenge of reducing inequalities in oral health and the aspiration of universal coverage of oral health services are to be realised.


Asunto(s)
Salud Global , Liderazgo , Salud Bucal , Enfermedades de la Boca , Factores Socioeconómicos
4.
Prev Med Rep ; 14: 100832, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31011516

RESUMEN

The study aims to assess the association between socio-demographic factors such as age, gender, area of residence, father's education, and standard of living and the likelihood of tobacco use in adolescence. We conducted secondary data analysis on a large scale cross-sectional study comprising of 1386 adolescents, living in regions representative of three different socioeconomic positions in New Delhi. Data was collected through clinical oral examination and interviewer-administered questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression analysis with an unadjusted model for assessing the association between the respective explanatory variable and ever tobacco use. Sequential models were adjusted for confounders as well as the other explanatory variables. The number of tobacco users was 185 (13%). Gender wise tobacco use shows significant (P = 0.001) difference between girls vs. boys; the girls are about 40% less likely to use tobacco than boys (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.42-0.80). Among socio-economic classes, residents of resettlement colonies were twice as likely to use tobacco as middle/upper middle class residents (OR = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.45-3.53). Adolescents with fathers educated up to the primary or secondary levels were almost twice likely to have used tobacco than those with fathers educated till graduation or above (OR = 2.08 95% CI = 1.30-3.34 vs. OR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.43-3.51, respectively). Significant (P = 0.001) difference in tobacco use among adolescents was also observed based on their standard of living. A significant association exists in terms of area of residence, father's education, and standard of living.

5.
J Public Health Dent ; 76(3): 198-205, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27589667

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Studies in high-income countries have reported associations between tooth loss and hypertension. There is however a lack of evidence on this association from South Asian countries especially India. The current study aimed to assess the association between self-reported tooth loss and hypertension in a primarily rural middle-aged and older Indian population. METHODS: A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study of India - pilot survey was conducted on 1,486 adults aged 45 years and above from four states of India. The primary outcome was self-reported hypertension and the main explanatory variable was self-reported tooth loss. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated the association between hypertension and tooth loss after controlling for confounders including age, sex, marital status, area of residence, educational attainment, tobacco use, alcohol use, physical activity, and self-reported diabetes. RESULTS: Compared to those without any tooth loss, individuals with partial tooth loss had 1.62 times (95% CI: 1.12-2.35) higher odds of being hypertensive after adjustment of confounders including age, sex, marital status, area of residence, educational attainment, tobacco use, alcohol use, physical activity, and self-reported diabetes. The crude significant association (OR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.50-4.29) between edentulousness and hypertension became nonsignificant and attenuated after adjustment of potential confounders (fully adjusted model OR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.72-2.44). CONCLUSION: Partial tooth loss was associated with a higher probability of hypertension among dentate middle-aged and older adults in four states of India.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/epidemiología , Pérdida de Diente/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Factores de Riesgo , Población Rural , Factores Socioeconómicos
6.
Biomed Res Int ; 2015: 837804, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26273649

RESUMEN

Socioeconomic differences in tobacco use have been reported, but there is a lack of evidence on how they vary according to types of tobacco use. This study explored socioeconomic differences associated with cigarette, bidi, smokeless tobacco (SLT), and dual use (smoking and smokeless tobacco use) in India and tested whether these differences vary by gender and residential area. Secondary analysis of Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) 2009-10 (n = 69,296) was conducted. The primary outcomes were self-reported cigarette, bidi smoking, SLT, and dual use. The main explanatory variables were wealth, education, and occupation. Associations were assessed using multinomial logistic regressions. 69,030 adults participated in the study. Positive association was observed between wealth and prevalence of cigarette smoking while inverse associations were observed for bidi smoking, SLT, and dual use after adjustment for potential confounders. Inverse associations with education were observed for all four types after adjusting for confounders. Significant interactions were observed for gender and area in the association between cigarette, bidi, and smokeless tobacco use with wealth and education. The probability of cigarette smoking was higher for wealthier individuals while the probability of bidi smoking, smokeless tobacco use, and dual use was higher for those with lesser wealth and education.


Asunto(s)
Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Productos de Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Uso de Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Escolaridad , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , India/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distribución por Sexo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...